William Henry Smyth, a Californian engineer, is usually credited with inventing the word technocracy in to describe "the rule of the people made effective through the agency of their servants, the scientists and engineers", although the word had been used before on several occasions.
A somewhat similar argument could be made for the WW II, but, in general, preventive wars are nothing new in human history. But what about Russia, one may ask, or China. Taken at face value the question may seem strange—both China, and especially Russia are nuclear armed states which can defend themselves.
They do have deterrents and that supposedly should stop any attempt on any kind of war on them. This all is true but only so far. One may consider the current geopolitical situation in which China has all but created a new alternative economic power poleand in which the US finds herself increasingly in the position of the still extremely important but second and, eventually, even third place player in Eurasian economic development.
This is not the case with Russia. It becomes also true when one begins to look at doctrinal and technological developments both in the US and Russia. The contrast is startling, even if one considers a very dubious US intelligence analysis on Russia.
This is not the case with the United States who is a consummate expeditionary power and fights wars not on own territory, and whose population and political elites are not conditioned by continental warfare.
This quantification remains virtually unchanged for modern day Russia. Even famous Russophobe and falsifier, Richard Pipes, was forced to admit that: Such figures are beyond the comprehension of most Americans.
Such a country Russia tends also to assess the rewards of defense in much more realistic terms. As Michael Lind writes: The possibility of military defeat and invasion are usually left out of discussion….
The United States, if one discounts Pearl Harbor has not suffered a serious invasion from ; Britain, though it has been bombed from the air in the 20th centuryhas been free from foreign invasion even longer…. Elsewhere in the world, political elites cannot as easily separate foreign policy and economics.
Russia lives under these pressures constantly and, in fact, Russians as ethnos were formed and defined by warfare. Russia is also defined by her weapons and it is here where we may start looking for one of the most important rationales for anti-Russian hysteria in Washington which have proceeded unabated sincethe return of Crimea inin reality even earlier.
The problem here is not with Russia, which offers unprecedented access to all kinds of foreigners, from businessmen and tourists to political and intelligence overt and covert professionals. That is the reality not defined by meaningless Wall Street economic indices.
Whether this lesson will be learned by the combined West is yet to be seen. So far, the learning process has been slow for US crowd which cheered on US deindustrialization and invented a fairy tale concept of post-industrial, that is non-productive, virtual economy.
No other nation with the exception of the US and Russia, not even China, can produce and procure a cutting edge military technology which has capabilities beyond the reach of everyone else.The onslaught of western Russia bashing in the past days, since the alleged poison attack by a Soviet-era nerve agent, Novichok (the inventor of which, by the way, lives in the US), on a Russian double agent, Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, has been just horrifying.
Especially by the UK. During the August Russo-Georgian War, the operations of Russia’s 58 th Army were termed as “coercion into peace”. It is an appropriate term once one recalls what truly was at stake then. The Russian government developed and implemented a "full-spectrum" disinformation machine to influence the political system in the United regardbouddhiste.com attempt to influence the U.S.
election through social media is but one example of how traditional espionage, foreign .
A transcript of the leaders' news conference. Analysis Interpretation of the news based on evidence, including data, as well as anticipating how events might unfold based on past events.
It’s a foregone conclusion that Vladimir Putin will win Russia’s March presidential elections, so why is the Kremlin fretting about turnout? The Midterm Elections are fast approaching.
ABC News brings you in-depth coverage and breaking political news, as voters determine the Senate and House of Representatives.