Tweet Argumentative essay on Same Sex marriage Marriage has been a part of life since before the medieval times. For two people who love each other and plan on spending the rest of their lives together, the natural instinct is to make it legal and get married. This being said same sex marriage has been widely discussed and debated on if it should be legalized or not. It is discriminating not to allow two people who want to get married just because they are homosexual.
Almost overnight, same-sex marriage became a major national issue, pitting religious and social conservatives against gay-rights advocates and their allies. Over the next year, the ensuing battle over gay marriage could be heard in the halls of the U.
Congress, in dozens of state legislatures and in the rhetoric of election campaigns at the national and state level. The debate over same-sex marriage shows no signs of abating. In addition, Florida will hold a referendum during the November election on a state constitutional amendment that would prohibit gay marriage.
Other states, such The battle over same sex marriage essay Arizona and Indiana, are considering putting similar referenda on the November ballot.
Supporters of same-sex marriage contend that gay and lesbian couples should be treated no differently than their heterosexual counterparts and that they should be able to marry like anyone else.
Beyond wanting to uphold the principle of nondiscrimination and equal treatment, supporters say that there are very practical reasons behind the fight for marriage equity. They point out, for instance, that homosexual couples who have been together for years often find themselves without the basic rights and privileges that are currently enjoyed by heterosexual couples who legally marry — from the sharing of health and pension benefits to hospital visitation rights.
Social conservatives and others who oppose same-sex unions assert that marriage between a man and a woman is the bedrock of a healthy society because it leads to stable families and, ultimately, to children who grow up to be productive adults.
Allowing gay and lesbian couples to wed, they argue, will radically redefine marriage and further weaken it at a time when the institution is already in deep trouble due to high divorce rates and the significant number of out-of-wedlock births.
Moreover, they predict, giving gay couples the right to marry will ultimately lead to granting people in polygamous and other nontraditional relationships the right to marry as well. The American religious community is deeply divided over the issue of same-sex marriage.
The Catholic Church and evangelical Christian groups have played a leading role in public opposition to gay marriage, while mainline Protestant churches and other religious groups wrestle with whether to ordain gay clergy and perform same-sex marriage ceremonies.
Indeed, the ordination and marriage of gay persons has been a growing wedge between the socially liberal and conservative wings of the Episcopal and Presbyterian churches, leading some conservative congregations and even whole dioceses to break away from their national churches.
Many countries, especially in Europe, have grappled with the issue as well. And sincefour nations — the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and South Africa — have legalized gay marriage. In addition, the provinces of Ontario, British Columbia and Quebec in Canada now allow same-sex couples to legally marry.
Even though this decision did not immediately lead to the legalization of gay marriage in the state the case was sent back to a lower court for further considerationit did spark a nationwide backlash.
Over the next decade, legislatures in more than 40 states passed what are generally called Defense of Marriage Acts DOMAswhich define marriage solely as the union between a man and a woman. Today, 42 states have DOMAs on the books. In addition, in the U. Congress passed, and President Bill Clinton signed, a federal DOMA that defines marriage for purposes of federal law as the union between a man and a woman.
The law also asserts that no state can be forced to legally recognize a same-sex marriage performed in another state. Beginning in the late s, Alaska, Nebraska and Nevada amended their state constitutions to prohibit same-sex marriage.
These constitutional changes were aimed at taking the issue out of the hands of judges. Amid widespread efforts in many states to prevent same-sex marriage, there was at least one notable victory for gay-rights advocates during this period.
Inthe Vermont Supreme Court ruled that gay and lesbian couples are entitled to all of the rights and protections associated with marriage. However, the court left it up to the state legislature to determine how to grant these rights to same-sex couples.
The following year, the Vermont legislature approved a bill granting gay and lesbian couples the right to form civil unions. Massachusetts Department of Public Health, left the legislature no options, requiring it to pass a law granting full marriage rights to same-sex couples.
Television images of long lines of same-sex couples waiting for marriage licenses outside of government offices led some social conservatives and others to predict that same-sex marriage would soon be a reality in many parts of the country.
But these predictions proved premature. To begin with, all the marriage licenses issued to gay couples outside of Massachusetts were later nullified since none of the mayors and other officials involved had the authority to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples. More significantly, the Massachusetts decision led to another major backlash at the federal and state level.The Argument against Same-Sex Marriage A battle has been in progress for years over whether equal rights and equal protection against discrimination should be extended to homosexuals.
Recently this has expanded into the area of marriage. As more states are allowing same-sex marriage, a new battle over so-called religious freedom and protection for gays against discrimination is just heating up.
Jun 27, · For Same-Sex Marriage Opponents, The Fight Is Far From Over Some opponents of same-sex marriage are vowing to fight on after Friday's Supreme Court ruling.
The battles will likely take place in. Constitutional amendments and same-sex marriage – Lesson Plan the student will come to understand the legal battle over legalizing same-sex marriage and the process of amending the U.S.
Lay Catholics and lay-funded, stand-alone organizations took the lead in the same-sex marriage debate. There are at this point very few clerical voices of public consequence in American public life. That role is instead played by lay Catholics such as Garry Wills, George Weigel, and Ross Douthat.
Check Out Our Legalizing Same Sex Marriage Essay Over the year the gay society had battling for equal treatment and the abolishment of discrimination.
And now their battle is for the legality of same sex marriage.